Study Guide for Renault's The Nature of Alexander
John M.
McMahon, Le Moyne College
New York Council for the Humanities "Lives Worth Knowing" Program (Fall
1996):
A Study Guide for Renault's The Nature of Alexander
1. Source Material and its Limitations:
a. What difficulties of evidence must the modern biographer address in
reconstructing a life culturally distant from the modern world
and greatly romanticized over the intervening milennia?
b. How does Renault present the interplay of historical sources and
legendary accounts in introducing the reader to the story of Alexander?
What particular incidents in the life of Alexander as recounted by
Renault can be seen to exemplify the tensions between history and
the accretions of legend?
c. What role does speculation play in Renault's account of incidents
and in her analyses of motives throughout the work? (e.g., in her
account of the murder of Philip)
2. Biography and History: According to Plutarch (Life
of Alexander) the
portrayal of human temperament differentiates biography from a simple
historical recounting of events.
a. What particular incidents in Alexander's life allow Renault's
insights into his
personality to function as biography rather than simply as history?
b. How does Renault fashion the larger historical narrative to
highlight
particular incidents as biographically significant?
c. What role does lineage and the right of succession play in the
account?
3. The Role of the Biographer: Marc Pachter puts selectivity at
the very
heart of great biography, and William Runyan contends that the biographer
brings a specific perspective to bear on available data.
a. In what ways does Renault exhibit selectivity? In other words,
what aspects of
the available material does she rely upon to fashion her portrait of
Alexander? How does this selectivity contribute to her picture
of him?
b. Given that the
image of Alexander has changed as different ages and peoples
have adopted him into their own cultural, social and political
milieu,
what similar considerations might be expected in a biography
written in the latter half of
the present century? Where in Renault's account do such
considerations surface? How do they reflect her approach to
her subject?
c.
Renault's own personal observations often form an element of her
analyses of incidents.
Which examples reveal the personality of the biographer herself
in the narrative?
4. Biography as Analysis: According to Alan Elms, the writer of
psychologically- based biography needs only two personal qualities: an
empathy for the subject and a commitment to solid biographical data.
a. Which specific passages are evidence that Renault has
incorporated these
two qualities into her narrative and into her analyses of
Alexander's
personality?
b. What particular aspects of AlexanderÕs physical and
intellectual character does
Renault present? How do these contribute to her portrayal of him?
c. What specific relationships in AlexanderÕs life does Renault
emphasize as
significant in influencing his actions? What conclusions does
she draw about
the effects of each of these relationships?
d. Renault's analyses of AlexanderÕs motives and inner thoughts often
take the form of
abbreviated personal observations during or at the end of accounts of
particularly significant incidents. Which are the most striking
in their effect?
Why? How do they lead the reader to understand RenaultÕs intended
portrait of the
personality of Alexander?
e.
How does Renault view the influence of the works of Homer and
Xenophon on Alexander? In
which instances does she emphasize this influence?
5. Biography as Literature:
a. What is the effect of beginning the work with the account of
Alexander's
funeral? What role might the account of Alexander's funeral
train and the
subsequent fate of his coffin play in establishing a framework for
the way
Renault tells the story of Alexander in the remainder of the book?
b. What incidents related by Renault are particularly well-told?
How do these
further the narrative? How do they enable Renault to succeed with
her portrayal of
Alexander? Which elements of the narrative do not contribute to
this portrayal?
c. Where in the narrative do the themes of companionship, mistrust,
devotion, pain, fear, and
death appear? How do they function as the means by which
Renault depicts the character of Alexander and of his
contemporaries?
Selected Recent Bibliography on Alexander:
- Andronikos, Manolis, et al. The Search for Alexander: An Exhibition. Boston:
New York Graphic Society, 1980. (DF11.3. W37 S4 1980b) The catalogue of
artifacts from the exhibition mounted at the National Gallery in Washington,
D. C., including those excavated in 1977 from the Macedonian Royal Tombs at
Vergina.
- Bamm, Peter. Alexander the Great: Power as Destiny. Trans. by J. M. Brownjohn.
New York: McGraw- Hill, 1968. (DF234. E423) A readable and attractive
volume featuring artistic and archaeological images detailing the life of
Alexander from his boyhood in Macedon to his death in Babylon.
- Bieber, Margarete. Alexander the Great in Greek and Roman Art. Chicago:
Argonaut, 1964. (DF234.3. B5) An illustrated and chronologically arranged
survey of the representations of Alexander.
- Bosworth, A. B. From Arrian to Alexander: Studies in Historical Interpretation,
Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1988. (DF234.2. B67 1988) An
academic investigation into the historical and literary features of
ArrianÍs History of Alexander.
- Carlsen, Jesper, et al. eds. Alexander the Great: Reality and Myth. Rome:
"L'Erma" di Bretschneider, 1993. (DF234. A53 1993) A collection of
articles, some illustrated, drawn from a 1992 conference on Alexander.
Carlsen's "Alexander the Great: 1970-1990" (41-52) surveys recent work on
Alexander.
- Green, Peter. Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C.: A Historical Biography.
Berkeley: University of California Press, c.1991. (DF234. G68 1991) A
reprint of the 1974 work written by an eminent scholar of Ancient Greece and
designed for a general readership. A second edition is currently in progress.
- O'Brien, John Maxwell. Alexander the Great: The Invisible Enemy: A Biography.
London and New York: Routledge, 1992. (DF234. O27 1992) A well researched
biographical study emphasizing the role of alcohol and the influence of
Greek literature on the personality and actions of Alexander.
- Stewart, Andrew F. Faces of Power: Alexander's Image and Hellenistic Politics.
Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993. (DF234.2. S74 1993) A
serious and engaging art-historical discussion of the image of Alexander
featuring a host of illustrations and a wealth of technical analyses.
Biography:
- Elms, Alan C. Uncovering Lives: The Uneasy Alliance of Biography and
Psychology. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. (BF39.4.
E46 1994) A recent work addressing issues and difficulties in
psychobiography.
- Karl, F. R. Biography and Sources Studies. Vol. 1. New York: AMS Press, 1994.
(CT 21 B472 v.1) The first of a proposed annual series on issues and
approaches to the genre of biography.
- Pachter, M. ed., Telling Lives: The Biographer's Art. Washington, D.C.: New
Republic Books, 1979. (CT 21. T44) A collection of essays by prominent
biographers covering a range of issues in the genre. Of note is Barbara
Tuchman's "Biography as a Prism of History" (132-147).
- Runyan, William M. Life Histories and Psychobiology. New York and Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1982. (BF 38.5 R86 1982) Studies on the writing
of biography from the psychological perspective. Chapters 2 and 3
address the problems presented by alternative accounts of the lives of
biographical subjects, including the likes of Christ, Shakespeare, and Linclon.
- Runyan, William McKinley, ed. Psychology and Historical Interpretation. New
York: Oxford University Press, 1988. (D16.16. P87 1988)
Academically-oriented essays on the use of psychological analysis for
interpreting historical phenonomena.
Return to De Flavio
Magistro