CJS/SOC 321-
Case Rubric
This rubric
is designed to give students guidance about what is expected of them in terms
of how the case assignments are evaluated.
The numbers will also be used as a “short-hand” method to make comments
on your submitted case materials. In order to receive a grade of "A"
for the assignment, there must be no category that receives an evaluation lower
than 3 and at least three (including Understanding) must receive a 4. To
receive a grade of "B" for the assignment, there must be no category
that receives an evaluation lower than 2 and at least four (including
Understanding) must receive a 3. If you receive evaluations of 1 for one or
more categories, you are likely to receive a failing grade.
|
Excellent
(4) |
Good (3) |
Mediocre
(2) |
Poor (1) |
Style
– . |
The case
material is well written in clear and grammatically correct English with
correct word usage. Sentences are well
written and flow logically. |
The case
material is, for the most part, well written in clear and grammatically
correct English. |
The case
material has a significant number of grammatical errors and/or incorrect word
choice. |
The case
material is poorly written and hard to understand with many grammatical
errors and misused words. |
Citations -
Improperly cited papers will be returned for
correction with grade deduction |
All
appropriate material is cited (i.e. quotations, facts which are not common
knowledge, ideas which are not your own) and citations have all the
appropriate information including page numbers. |
Almost
all appropriate material is cited and citations have all the appropriate
information including page numbers. |
Most
appropriate material is cited but some is not. Citations may not all have the appropriate
information. |
Much
of the appropriate material is not cited and citations may not include all
the appropriate information. |
Sources |
The case
uses at least four "scholarly" sources to a considerable extent and
does not rely on any one source for more than 1/3 of citations. |
The case
uses at least three "scholarly" sources to a considerable extent
and does not rely on any one source for more than 1/2 of citations. |
The case
uses fewer than three "scholarly" sources and/or relies on one
source for more than 1/2 of citations. |
The case
uses fewer than two "scholarly" sources and/or relies on one source
for more than 1/2 of citations. |
Understanding |
The case
material indicates that the student has understood the issues in the case
clearly including the subtle issues. The student has understood the arguments
on both sides of the issue and approached them in a logical and creative
manner. |
The case
material indicates that the student has understood the issues in the case
clearly. The student has understood the arguments on both sides of the issue
and approached them in a logical manner. |
The case
material indicates that the student has an incomplete understanding of the
issues in the case. Arguments on both sides may have been incorporated but
not in a completely logical manner. |
The case
material indicates that the student has a poor understanding of the issues in
the case. The student has either not understood or not addressed the
arguments on both sides of the issue. |
Social
Science |
The
analysis relies heavily on appropriate social science arguments and social
science data. |
The
analysis relies somewhat on appropriate social science arguments and social
science data. |
The
analysis relies to a very limited extent on approriate social science
arguments and data or those arguments and data are misused. |
The
analysis does not use social science arguments or data. |