Advait96.doc Advait96.html; html version of my notes from Huston Smith, Noss, Koller, Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy

Comments, additions, and corrections are welcome.
Please send them to
Michael Kagan
Le Moyne College Department of Philosophy
Syracuse, NY 13214
Email: KAGAN@maple.lemoyne.edu 


Smith

Discuss the problem that Hinduism addresses according to Smith in terms
of the conflict of finitude, and the conflict between what we want
[infinite being, knowledge and joy] and what we have.  Remind them of
Browning.  Discuss Smith's characterization of the teaching of Hinduism
as "you can have what you want".  The issue becomes making sense of this
claim and figuring out what we really want.  Point out that one
way of finding out that one's ultimate needs aren't satisfied by a given
y is to receive y and find out that one is not yet happy.  Candidates
for y are:
        
        (1-2)   [path of desire] pleasure, worldly success [wealth, fame,
power],
        (3-4)   [path of renunciation], duty; mukti [complete liberation
from life's limitations (p. 27 Smith)  

I. Discuss the concept of Atman, the problem of what underlies change, some of the arguments for the existence of the soul/Soul. [see HS pp. 36. II. The four ways to getting there
A. Jnana Yoga [knowledge
B. Bhakti Yoga {love}
(1) Japam: repeating the name of God
(2) "Ringing the changes on love" [loving G in many
aspects]
(3) Worship of one's chosen ideal [narrowness increases
intensity.
C. Karma Yoga {work}
(1) Lo lema'an lekabel pras--the work is not done for one's
own sake, but rather with steady concentration and de-
tachment.
(2) Another way of seeing this is as acting from duty. D. Raja Yoga {royal road/psychological exercises}
(1) function of Hindu concept of person:
(a) body
(b) conscious
(c) individual subconscious
(d) being-itself [Atman?]
(2) The eight step process
1. 5 abstentions [injury, lying, stealing,
sensuality, and greed]
2. 5 observances [cleanliness, contentment,
self-control, studiousness, and contempla-
tion of the divine]
3. Asanas [postures] for disciplining the body
enough to keep it from being distracting; e.g.,
lotus position, half-lotus, corpse, and c. See
if there are any volunteers out there.
4. Breathing exercises [prajna yoga?]
5. Anaesthesis through inner focus
6. concentration
7. concentration without subject/object dichotomy
8. samadhi [togetherness with the ultimate one]
ineffable, beyond formal characterization,
limitation, or description. III. The Four Stages [p61ff]
"People are different. . . . serious attention to it is one of Hinduism's distinctive features." [Briefly discuss stage theories of human development with their crisis and task orientations. Refer them to Erikson as an example.] A. Student [traditionally 8-12 years + 12 more years] B. Householder [marriage till approx. 20-30 years later, after the arrival of the first grandchild] 1. Family [pleasure] 2. Vocation [success] 3. Community [duty] C. Retirement 1. Time to leave, to focus on discovering/developing one's own identification with the Atman. D. Sannyasin "one who neither hates nor loves anything" [remember that love and hate are thought of as relations between at least two entities]
NOTE that the Sannyasin is free to return, and note that this theme of return recurs throughout many religious traditions. IV. The Stations of Life [the issue of caste] {I am here also relying on Radhakrishnan and Moore's Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy selections from the Laws of Manu [pp. 184-189] from which I intend to read during lecture to illustrate a classic Indian view}
NOTE the defense which Smith offers for this is along the lines of that offered by Plato in the Republic. Discuss the different kind of theories of power arrangement with respect to their theories of the human person, if time permits. A. Brahmin [priest or teacher] B. Kshatriya [king or prince or warrior] C. Vaishya [tradesman] D. Shudras [workers] Philosophical Theology God I. Via Negativa "neti . . . neti" II. Brahman [from brih "to be great"] A. Given transcendent attributes [nirguna Brahman] 1. Sat [being--point out that I'm assuming //ism in HS] 2. Chit [awareness] 3. Ananda [Bliss] B. Given personal attributes [Saguna Brahman] 1. Ishwara or Bagavan [supreme person] C. Described in terms of relation to the world [HS describes this as part of Saguna Brahman 1. Brahma [creator] 2. Vishnu [preserver] 3. Shiva [destroyer] Psychology I. Samsara "passing through intensely" [reincarnation/the wheel] A. Karma [by the human level Karma bears on process of what HS describes almost as social promotion]: "moral law of cause and effect".
EVERYTHING an individual experiences is a function of his/her previous thoughts, attitudes, and actions. This results in: 1. complete personal responsibility 2. no chance or accidents 3. [HS does not point this out] Justification of the Caste system Cosmology I. Cyclical oscillating universe [in-out/on-off] II. Karmic universe, +/- with respect to good and evil; not perfectible, rather a training place for soul-making. III. Reality of the universe grounded in God A. Dualist says "and it's real enough" B. Non-dualists say "and it's illusion" arguing that this is seen in higher experience as hallucination is revealed by ordinary experience. MAYA. 1. Lila [God's play] C. As HS points out, "It is no accident that the only art form India failed to produce was tragedy." [85] Discuss this as an advantage and a disadvantage. Doctrine of the Many Paths Discuss Ramakrishnah's imperative to worship where others do while remaining faithful to your own religion. [p. 87 HS]

Additional Notes from Noss Chapter 3

For the most part, the section on early Hinduism is a rather lengthy discussion of the early sacrificial cult. Tat tvam asi == that art thou. (p. 88) Additional Notes from Noss Chapter 7: Later Hinduism With respect to issue of women, p. 181 immolation: suttee, now forbidden by law. Note relationship of Gita to war--quote from Noss quoting Gita, p. 186*. Relate this to the issue of motivation in works systems. Note also claim based in quote on p. 188 concerning openness of the Bhagavad Gita to all without regard to sex and caste. Six Systems (list Noss 189, note). 8 steps of yoga p. 190-1. 3 Classic vedanta systems, p. 192 ff., with founders' dates. Sankara's non-dualism (advaita)[788-820] Ramanuja's qualified non-dualism (visist- advaita).[1040?-1137] Madhva's dualism (dvaita) [1199-?]

More on Maya.

Discuss problems with realism. Problems w representative realism. The move to world as appearance. The insight of Protagoras about m the measure makes sense of the world of appearance being determined by human needs etc. Skeptical challenges. The temptations of idealism; the mysteries of materialism (If materialists, where does mind come from?--problems of interaction, emergent qualities, etc.). Mapping. The difference between the technical truth and the world we think we live in. Language Truth and Reality; the Whorf-Sapir hypothesis. Differences in perceptual organization according to culture, e.g., Japanese centrality of space, western centrality of space takers. Time differences--the length of a moment a while. How long is long term. Discuss Edward T. Hall's work on time and space. Space perception may (and may not have gender connection. Certainly within many cultures not only is the general cultural perception different from other cultures but there are gender and subcultural divisions as well. Discuss objects as constructs. Bring Goodman, on sampling, p. 134 WOW. Discuss systematic build ups of world, like systems geometric/axiomatic.

Shankara's non-dualism (8th cent) Atman- Brahman in Advaita-Vedanta

Atman, Brahman in advaita-vedanta are ultimately one. "The individual. self, as pure subject, or Atman, is not different from Brahman." Koller, Oriental Philosophies., 2d ed., p. 86. In the Stevenson Reader, Stevenson presents a different interpretation of this in his introduction to a selection from the Upanishads in The Study of Human Nature: Readings, 1981, p. 11. It is to be noted that the Upanishads are part of the material that is interpreted differently by the dualists and non-dualist commentator-creators of the three major vedanta systems, and that it is certainly reasonable for Stevenson to be able to find something in them that Shankara (founder of advaita) did not. For advaita, form is not real not does it have separate existence from its substance; all we see are different forms of the same one underlying subs. The argument goes something like, if you say the formal differences make differences in substance then I standing am different from I sitting [see p. 88 Koller] (note that this may be admitted if one is willing to take weirder view of World). Also suppose forms are distinct from objects, then how related but by a third; how about the third? (p. 88, Koller). Back to maya. Things "exist" in contexts of illusions even if not real. E.g., snake in dream. Character in a play. Rope-snake as paradigm illusion. There is X, X is thought to be not X, but is X. The illusion comes from ignorance. (p. 89, Koller) Maya is real in that it is experienced. But in higher level experience, it is realized how this experience mislead. Discuss the monster in the dark bedroom. Remove ignorance, remove barriers to awareness of oneness w Brahman. This knowledge is beyond argument and description, but can be attained through disciplined study and meditation.

Ramanujas's qualified Monism (11 cent.)

Now, for Ramanujas's qualified Monism reality is one, but the many are real as parts of the one--a kind of panentheism, as I understand it (see Koller, pp. 94ff). The relation between Brahma and U is like that of the self and its body, a unity, the self is superior the body its qualifications, organic relationship. The things we perceive are modes of Brahman, real as modes.

Dualistic vedanta--Madhva 13 cent

Arguments for dualism on the basis of reliability of perception, and by using a version of Leibniz' law-- Brahman doesn't suffer, I suffer, therefore, I am not B. (p. 97 Koller)

back to Kagan's homepage